Online Mastering Services
Organic, analogue mastering to make your music feel alive
Mastering is about more than making music louder. It’s about teasing out the details in your mix. Gluing tracks and albums into cohesive worlds. And defining the record’s sound.
With a hand-picked selection of gorgeous analogue equipment, I craft deep textures, rich tones, and a vibrant sonic character to make your music somewhere listeners want to live.
Mastering Portfolio
Online Mastering Services
The personal touch
Online mastering can feel… anonymous. I do everything I can to bring the personal touch to both your music and your experience.
If I haven’t mixed the record myself, I’ll happily provide detailed, practical feedback to get your mixes into the best possible shape before touching a single knob.
And once you’re happy with your masters, I make a point of telling you what I’ve done. So you know exactly how much care and attention has gone into making your music sound its best.
Real Analogue equipment
Plugins have come a long way, but they still can’t give your recordings the same richness, depth, and sense of life that high-end analogue can.
Over the years, I’ve built an analogue chain that gives me the perfect balance between transparency and character: from near-invisible elegance to gooey warmth and biting fizz.
99% of my mastering is done in analogue. Because I know my chain inside and out. It gives me tactile control. And nothing beats the electricity of sending your tracks through real circuits.
Mastering for CD, download & streaming
I provide a single, 44.1kHz/16-bit master suitable for CD, download, and streaming as standard. Additional file formats, sample rates and bit depths are available on request.
Mastering for vinyl
Digital loudness techniques, excessive sibilance, and stereo bass can all play havoc with vinyl. I can provide high-resolution vinyl pre-masters ready to cut to wax.
Online Mastering Rates
Mastering for digital distribution
Single (1 track): £65
EP (2-5 tracks): £55 per track
Album (6+ tracks): £50 per track
DDP file for CD pressing: £50
Additional versions & instrumentals: £10 per track
Vinyl pre-masters
£10 per track additional to standard rate
All prices include up to two revisions, and one minor mix re-submission. Major mix changes are charged as new tracks. No VAT to pay.
Upload your tracks for mastering
When you’re ready for mastering, simply send your stereo mixdowns to [email protected] using FromSmash.com or your favourite large file sharing service.
Please ensure files are:
- Stereo interleaved, 24-bit WAV or AIFF
- At the sample rate of your mixing project
- With 3dB headroom, or at least no clipping
- With master limiters switched off
Posted on chris barry19 February 2026Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I had spent over 2 years writing and recording an album of songs, and, having ‘mastered’ Logic-Pro X, watched endless YouTube videos and invested in various plug-ins, fancied myself more than capable of mixing the whole thing. They were my songs after all, and I trusted my ears and felt I knew what I wanted – and, even if I did get someone else to mix it, it would surely be too difficult explaining to them what I was after. Most of the songs were huge too with upwards of 60 stems. So, I then spent weeks mixing them all and I have to say I was pretty damned happy with my work – right up until I started playing them to people who knew what they were talking about. “Nice songs, but have you considered getting a proper mixing engineer to mix them?” was the politest comment I had! Pride battered, but I decided to do some research and came across Nick Lewis’s profile. He had been a mastering engineer before becoming a mixing engineer and that caught my attention for some reason. I called him and it was clear from our first conversation that he had a lot of knowledge and a very broad taste in music which was important fo me as the songs are very varied from jazz to country to rock to voice and guitar. I decided to send Nick one of the songs to see how it would all work, and it was just instant transformation. He managed to do in about 24 hours what I hadn’t been able to do in weeks. How can I describe the difference? Essentially, my mix had a group of different musicians playing their own parts separately (as had actually been the case) but Nick’s mix made it feel they were all in the same room playing together. Clarity, a sense of space and a coherence to the whole thing. I gave it a few plays. The I replayed my own mix – and we won’t be listening to that again! What had I been thinking??!! I couldn’t believe how it could work with me sending 60-odd stems (multiple string parts, vocal, BVs, multiple guitars, drums, etc..), a few written notes along with a ‘guide mix’ and expect anyone to make sense of it, but it all worked amazingly well. Usually within a couple of days, I would get a version 1 mix back from Nick and it would almost always be pretty much spot on immediately. Of course, there are then the inevitable tweaks (this up a bit, that down a bit, oh and that bit I asked to go up a bit last week - could it go back down a bit please?), but Nick was unbelievably patient and responsive with my rather obsessive requests. He has passion for what he does and great technical skill. He did not want me to settle for anything less than perfection and I think that was key for me. It felt like he was totally invested in the project and seemed to understand what I was looking for, probably better than I did myself. Seventeen songs later, my album is now done – Nick mixed every song and has just mastered the whole album too, with separate masters ready for vinyl and for streaming. It was the best decision I made to engage Nick, and I now know that the songs I have written are sounding as good as they possible could. They are essentially home-studio recordings but it’s impossible to tell. And he hasn’t seen the last of me just yet – I’m now working on Volume 2 of my project and Nick will be getting a lot more stems coming his way in the not-too-distant! Chris BarryPosted on Daniel Corbridge19 December 2025Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Nothing but praise for Old Cottage Audio. I went to Nick to get my debut album mastered to give it its best shot at release. The album turned out better than I expected and Nick was nothing but kind and attentive the whole way through. Couldn't recommend them enough I'll defiantly be back for album 2!Posted on Naim25 November 2025Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Nick has now mastered two of my tracks with patience and friendliness. I am eager to work with him again on my future releases. Highly recommend.Posted on Dan Phillips19 November 2025Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Excellent work from Nick. He gave me a realistic timeframe to complete the project and was happy to make adjustments swiftly when requested. I love the sound of the masters and will definitely work with Nick again in the future. Highly recommendPosted on Ben Porter8 October 2025Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. What can I say. Nick was immense! He made my music sound better than I could have imagined. He was really quick and he kept me in the loop the whole process. There is not a single bad word I can say about him.. Old cottage has a customer for life in me..Posted on Giulia Pedrana3 October 2025Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I needed help with the masters for my album and Nick jumped in last minute and did an amazing job. He instantly understood what the songs needed. If you also need mastering for vinyl, Nick’s your guy!! The attention to detail and care he puts into his work is hard to find anywhere else.Posted on Ian McEwan3 October 2025Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Nick is fantastic - very communicative with really helpful guidance and feedback along the way through my own first attempt at mixing before he committed to mastering. Quick and realistic with his turnaround times and delivered accordingly.Posted on Brian Moran19 September 2025Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Nick recently mastered an album containing 8 tracks for me. I cannot reccommend his services highly enough. He communicated promptly and clearly at all times and clearly understood the briefing notes provided, as the end result was precisely what I was aiming / hoping for. In addition, he provided encouragement and some valuable pointers which, my being a relative novice, was most welcomed. Really pleased with the price and quality of his services - I will certainly use Old Cottage Audio again in the future.Posted on Luciano Aguilar17 September 2025Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Amazing experience! Nick is an expert :)Verified by TrustindexTrustindex verified badge is the Universal Symbol of Trust. Only the greatest companies can get the verified badge who has a review score above 4.5, based on customer reviews over the past 12 months. Read more
Mastering a song means treating the recording so it stands up against other releases within the same genre, translates across different playback systems and speakers, and hangs cohesively with the other songs on an EP or album.
It also means ensuring the master file complies with the technical specifications of the destination format.
Yes, mastering a song is necessary. Even the best mixes tend to be much quieter and have translation or balance issues that could be remedied in mastering.
Analogue mastering offers an additional sonic advantage, too. Sending tracks through high-end analogue equipment tends to imbue a liveliness that can’t be achieved with digital processing.
The most important thing is to make sure it sounds exactly the way you want it to. After that, please ensure you deliver the mix as:
- 24-bit WAV or AIFF
- At the same sample rate as your DAW project
- Without any limiters or clippers on the master bus (unless mixed into)
- With no clipping on the file
You may have heard that mixes should be delivered at -6dB. In truth it doesn’t really matter, as mastering engineers can always turn files up or down.
The most important thing is that the file doesn’t go over 0dB, as that can’t be undone.
In a nutshell, mastering means doing whatever needs to be done to finalise the record. In most cases, that means a layer of broad-stroke, balancing EQ, some subtle compression, and a mixture of clipping and limiting to raise the level to commercial standards.
Some mixes need more work than that – like surgical dynamic EQ, or an extra compressor. Some mixes don’t need anything beyond a limiter to raise the level.
The real value of a mastering engineer is having an experienced pair of ears that knows what needs doing – and what doesn’t.
No. Loudness normalisation is widely misunderstood. Most streaming services, like Spotify, have loudness normalisation built in, commonly to -14LUFS. But that doesn’t mean you need to deliver -14LUFS masters.
In fact, it’s riskier to hit the target. Services like Spotify have flip-flopped over the years as to whether normalisation is enabled by default, and some platforms, like Qobuz, don’t even include the feature anymore.
If you deliver at -14LUFS your track will be considerably quieter than tracks that have been mastered louder. If you deliver at the CD standard (generally between -11 and -8 LUFS) you’ll be in line with louder masters – and if you are normalised, you’ll just be turned down with everything else.
Try turning normalisation off on your Spotify account and you’ll notice most big releases are mastered considerably louder than -14LUFS.
Vinyl doesn’t like the brickwall clipping and limiting used for level when mastering for streaming and CD. Instead, it’s up to the cutting engineer to set a level that plays well with their lathe and that hits the sweet spot on the record.
Stereo bass and excessive sibilance can also cause issues with vinyl, but it very much depends on the cutting engineer’s equipment, so these judgements are best left to them.
As an analogue medium, vinyl also doesn’t need a particular sample rate – it’s best to deliver at the highest rate possible for maximum fidelity.
So, vinyl pre-masters are generally the same as the digital masters, but without any clipping or limiting – kept safely below 0dB – and delivered at the highest sample rate available.
The short answer is: as loud as is appropriate for the material.
The long answer is that it’s context dependent – both in terms of genre and how the track sits with the other songs on a record. I tend to favour a middle ground between loudness and dynamics, but am happy to nudge it one way or the other if that’s what you want.
Although I keep an eye on LUFS (and generally tend to hit somewhere between -11 and -8 LUFS) it’s a mistake to shoot for a particular target. The LUFS scale was originally developed for post-production – mixing TV and film – with a view to freeing engineers from looking at meters and just use their ears.
I try to deliver first masters within one week of receiving mixes, and revisions within two days of feedback. It does, of course, depend on what projects I already have booked in.
I will keep you informed of timings at every step of the way. If you have a deadline you need to meet, let me know so we can plan accordingly.